Sleaze!

Slimes of India does it again. They've taken a childrens story book and converted it into cheap trash.

I read the article, and wondered what the point was. This is a kind of journalism where you first decide on an angle (archies/harry are BAD) and then look for facts. Failing to find them, you twist existing ones to suit your story. Ranjan Yumnam, are you happy that your name is in print? Will you frame this story in your study? Show it to your dad's friends? As an example of investigative journalism?

If i take any passage from the bible, or from a seventh standard maths textbook, i can twist it into sleaze. The point is, was there hidden innuendo? In this case, it is extremely clear that it wasn't. Even out of context, the words sound like subtitles to v. bad vernacular porn. So what then, is the author trying to say? I'm still wondering.

In the sixth standard, boys in our class were on the threshold of puberty. They'd crack silly jokes where the punch line would be a private part. It got so, that we couldn't solve physics problems on momentum without the class going into hysterics. (Think, two balls colliding at speed x).

I'll say now what my physics teacher said then : "Boys, Grow up!"